• 154
  • 2
  • 524,340
  • done
Sponsored Downloadondemand_video
  • Blade.Runner (1997)
  • 703 MB
  • OTTO
  • Blade Runner 1997
  • English
  • 720p
79%

Blade Runner (1982)

  • Science Fiction Drama Thriller
  • In the smog-choked dystopian Los Angeles of 2019, blade runner Rick Deckard is called out of retirement to terminate a quartet of replicants who have escaped to Earth seeking their creator for a way to extend their short life spans.

    expand_more
    English
  • $28,000,000
  • Description

    In the 21st century, a corporation develops human clones to be used as slaves in colonies outside the Earth, identified as replicants. In 2019, a former police officer is hired to hunt down a fugitive group of clones living undercover in Los Angeles.

    IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083658/

    Blade Runner (1982) download

    Blade Runner (1982) download

    Blade Runner (1982) download


    More at ibit.to
    And ibit.uno
    And ibit.ws

    Reviews

    **Planet Noir** I declare _Blade Runner_ the best sci-fi movie of all time. Arguments? No? Okay. So long. Please upvote the guest book on your way out. WAIT! There's more. At the risk of whistling conspiracies and setting off inappropriate vibrations in your slacks, you see, this Ridley K. Dick concoction is going on right now. While we're all transfixed by the endlessly goofy droppings from the web, forever staring down and swiping things on our smarty-pants phones, retweeting selfies of infinitely mirrored selfies; proliferating at light speed, every aspect of humanity is being replicated, perfected, mechanized, optimized, upgraded, fortified, robofied, Googlized, quantumized, DNA'd and NSA'd and will soon converge to fall upon and supplant us, and Harrison Ford, despite looking trim for his years, will be too old to stop it! And the irony to end all ironies is that we, as the irresponsibly arrogant, over-infested and narcissistic caretakers and consumers, and the colossal defecators of this broken-down, flea-bag of a planet, are entirely fundamentally responsible. No, the irony of all ironies is that a world exclusively dominated by self-correcting technocratic cyborgs with zettabytes of artificial intelligence will be a vast improvement. The androids are saving the planet! AHHH, run for your life! Blade Runner is both an expired cautionary tale and emerging utopian fantasy. Oh, you knew this already? Very well. Carry on. Enjoy your self-driving cars and virtual nature tours.

    Retirement - Replicants - Resplendent. Blade Runner is one of those glorious films that has gained in popularity the older it has gotten. Ridley Scott's follow up to the critical and commercial darling that was Alien, was by and large considered a flop and damned for not being a science fiction action blockbuster. There was of course some fans who recognised its many many strengths during the initial weeks of its 1982 release, but many who now claim to have loved it back then are surely looking sheepishly in the mirror these days, for the hard-core minority of 82 fans remember it very differently. Remember the spider that lived outside your window? Orange body, green legs. Watched her build a web all summer, then one day there's a big egg in it. The egg hatched... Anyway, that's by the by, the point being that a film can sometimes be ahead of its time, misunderstood or miss-marketed, Scott's masterpiece is one such case. Story, adapted in fashion from Philip K. Dick's story, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Is pretty simple. It's a dystopian Los Angeles, 2019, and there are four genetically engineered Replicants - human in appearance - in the city, which is illegal. They were designed to work on off-world colonies, any Replicant who defies the rules will be retired by special police assassins known as Blade Runners, and Blade Runner Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford) is on this case. A case that will prove to have many layers... A new life awaits you in the Off-world colonies! A chance to begin again in a golden land of opportunity and adventure! Ridley Scott gets to have all his cakes to eat here, managing to blend intriguing science fiction with film noir. That the visuals are outstanding is a given, even the film's most hardest critics grudgingly acknowledge this to be an eye popping piece of visual class - the mention of eyes is on purpose since it's forms a key narrative thread. That it is awash with eye orgasms has led to critics calling a charge of beauty over substance, but the deep themes at work here tickle the brain and gnaw away at the senses. Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave. Mood is set at perpetually bleak, a classic film noir trait, and paced accordingly. Scott isn't here to perk anyone up, he's here to ask questions whilst filtering his main characters through a prism of techno decay, of humanity questioned to the max, for a film so stunning in visuals, it's surprisingly nightmarish at its core. The emotional spine is ever present, troubled when violence shows its hand, but it's there posing an intriguing question as the Replicants kill because they want to live. And this as our antagonist, Deckard (Ford a brilliantly miserable Marlowe clone), starts to fall for Rachael (a sensually effective femme fatale portrayal), one of his retirement targets. Tears in the Rain. As Rutger Hauer (never better) saunters more prominently into the story as head Replicant Roy Batty, the pic evolves still more. Haunting lyricism starts pulsing away in conjunction with Vangelis' rib shaking techno score, while Jordan Cronenweth's cinematography brings Scott's masterful visions to life, key characters one and all. Visuals, aural splendour and dark thematics - so just what does it mean to be human? - Indeed, curl as one in a magnificent cinematic achievement. A number of cuts of the film are out there, and all of them have fans, but Scott's Final Cut is the one where he had total artistic control, and the scrub up job across the board is quite literally breath taking. 10/10

    The movie's story didn't do much for me, however I did find parts of it confusing. After watching it I found out that I watched the "Final Cut" which has a completely different ending and different implications from the theatrical release. I didn't understand those implications...I needed to look up the ending online. Whether that's because the movie is confusing or I'm dumb, I can't say. But my friend I watched it with didn't understand it either. After looking up the end's meaning, I did find it a bit more satisfying. But the main reason this movie is worth watching is the visuals. Not sure I'd watch it again any time soon though.

    Some people will say this classic sci-fi "has nothing to offer other than overrated cult-status". To that, I would respond, "it has Rutger Hauer on a rooftop, and that's enough for me". _Final rating:★★★★ - Very strong appeal. A personal favourite._ (3.5 for the Theatrical Cut, 4.0 for the Final Cut)

    Comments

    3 years ago

    You either like "Blade Runner" or do not. If you are a film noire Sci-Fi fan, then this is for you. On the other hand, if you don't like dark, dreary and a rain soaked scenario, I suggest that you move on.The scene is 2019 in a futuristic Los Angeles (as seen from 1982) where there is little or no sunlight, rain soaked streets, flying cars, urban trash and people coming and going in every direction.A group of life like androids known as replicants have taken over a ship at an off-world colony and murdered the crew. The replicants who have a limited life span and were being used as slave labor, have returned to earth seeking their "creator" to attempt to have him prolong their lives.Enter Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford) a retired Blade Runner (a cop who terminates replicants) who is called out of retirement by sleazy police official Bryant (M. Emmett Walsh) and his creepy assistant Gaff (Edward James Olmos) to terminate the four replicants who are at large. The first, Leon Kowalski (Brion James) we meet in the opening sequence where he kills the research doctor who was testing him.Deckard begins the hunt by first meeting with "creator" Dr. Eldon Tyrell (Joe Turkel) the genius who devised the replicant program. He also meets his assistant Rachael (Sean Young) who turns out to be a more advanced replicant with more human like feelings. Deckard at first denies his true feeling but eventually an attraction builds between them.Deckard is attacked by Kowalski who as he is about to kill Deckard is himself killed in an unexpected way. Deckard tracks down Zhora (Joanna Cassidy) another replicant and brutally shoots her down if full view of the public. That leaves Roy Batty (Rutger Hauer) and Pris (Daryl Hannah) as the two remaining replicants at large.Batty has Pris seduce the mild mannered genius J.F. Sebastian (William Sanderson) in order to have him arrange a meeting with Dr. Tyrell. The meeting takes place and............................................................This film has had a number of different versions over the years. The original release ran 128 minutes and the "final version" released in 2007 runs 117 minutes. There were I think, a couple of other versions around as well until Director Ridley Scott supervised the full restoration of the film to the "final version".Harrison Ford's performance in the leading role is well, Harrison Ford. Rutger Hauer makes a scary villain but elicits sympathy in the end. Daryl Hannah with those long legs, makes a sexy alternative to Hauer.Followed by a sequel set thirty years after "Blade Runner" called "Blade Runner 2049" released in 2017.

    3 years ago

    The absolutely ONLY thing that this film has going for it - is that the director didn't succumb to the normal futuristic movie mistake (and particularly American penchant) of making everything clean. I dont know what it is, perhaps just the way the Hollywood sets and costumes are used in so many things - but if you watch even modern day episodes of Star trek - then a distant alien village of poor humanoids will still manage an immaculate village - and it will look as though people who have just come from the hairdressers have been handed a designer sack cloth which has just come from the dry cleaners. So blade runner is a completely run of the mill story which has been done a million times before - which has been placed in a gritty realistic dirty future. Star wars also sort of managed this a little - with ships and vehicles at least looking dirty and worm - but then spoilt it with aliens out of the muppets.So Blade runner after having a fantastic dirty realistic looking future - then spoils it not with the muppets, but by making everyone wander around in some sort of miserable haze. There's not a single spark of normal human emotion in the entire movie - which just drags itself from long silence to long silence, and standing in the rain.So it must be that people are just fixated on that stylization. Because apart from that dirty future - maybe the music is pretty cool. or at least it fits in. Harrison Ford is his normal grumpy looking self.

    3 years ago

    A feast for the eyes. Dark and uncompromising. With a haunting musical score by Vangelis that adds a hypnotic quality to those breathtaking megacity landscapes of future Los Angeles. Ridley Scott's adaptation of Philip K. Dick post-apocalyptic detective story 'Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep' is a visionary work of art; it's a dystopian masterpiece and I'd personally call it as much a milestone of science fiction as Kubrick's '2001' (and be advised to watch the version known as the "final cut" if you want to catch 'Blade Runner' as it was intended by its director). It's hard to overstate how influential the film was; it invented the sci-fi subgenre now known as "cyberpunk", and it was also the first "film noir" in a sci-fi setting. And although it looks so distractingly gorgeous that even today there are people who still dismiss it as superficial and mere "eye candy, it is a philosphically deep film that ponders existential questions about the nature of being human. Its slow, brooding nature will perhaps leave some modern audiences who are used to a different pace and more action underwhelmed - but make no mistake: this is a groundbreaking masterwork of its genre and a timeles classic. 10 stars out of 10.Favorite films: IMDb.com/list/mkjOKvqlSBs/Lesser-Known Masterpieces: imdb.com/list/ls070242495/

    5 years ago

    thanks yify

    2 years ago

    Thank you.........

    2 years ago

    Hoping this is the 2007 final cut even though 1997 is written on it

    6 years ago

    any link for the subtitle?(english)

    6 years ago

    Could anyone share a working english subtitle with me please?

    6 years ago

    Visual quality is amazing for the file size. Audio could be a tad better, but it's nothing so bad as to deter anyone from watching. This is hands down the best Final Cut download of it's size on Pirate Bay.

    A: 8 V: 10

    6 years ago

    you guys should always check out opensubtitles.org for subs :p download the zip, extract, rename the .srt file if you need to and make sure the video and .srt are in the same folder

    6 years ago

    Very good video quality for the file size. Thank you!

    6 years ago

    Don't listen to any of the idiot commenters saying this rip is adequate or good for its size. To call it awful is to put it mildly. Try something else and stop seeding this crap, YIFY is not always bad but there seems to be several people doing the rips and not all of them know what they're doing.

    6 years ago

    Thanks!

    6 years ago

    Media Player Classic searches subs for you, on most movies, all I have to do is press the "D" key and... Voila! subs.

    I highly reccomend this software, YIFY usualy provides us with Eng subs though.

    6 years ago

    Muchas gracias! Los subtítulos en español:

    6 years ago

    subtitles are in Bulgarian. WTF?

    6 years ago

    Idiots like Funk606 make me laugh... If you have 'plenty of space and speed', and intend to d/l a 26GB rip anyway... WHY THE HELL ARE YOU HERE COMMENTING ON THIS U/L?! Makes no fucking sense.

    6 years ago

    Thanks for this great upload. Quality is great as always from YIFY...........And for all those complaining about size and quality issues, just get your hollow skulls and get is crushed or make your own copy and watch.......

    6 years ago

    @Funk606 Wow, I can't believe how much I hate you given like a minute's worth of reading input.

    5 years ago

    perfect quality!

    thanks

    download eng subtitles from here:

    5 years ago

    rjcripe-

    We need more users like you!

    5 years ago

    ''any link for the subtitle?(english)''

    Yes, here you are:

    www.google.com

    my pleasure bro!

    5 years ago

    If you want the 1982 movie, don't download this shit, this is the 1997 remake.

    5 years ago

    It isn't a "remake" it's the "Final" version produced under the watch of Ridley Scott. It's closer (according to him) to his original vision. There is no remake.

    5 years ago

    THNX

    3 years ago

    it takes a real bunch of assholes to complain about a free movie, whose size is obvious before you even begin to download. you got something better to upload, then do it. otherwise STFU you whiny pansies.

    2 years ago

    What moron downloads this POS quality of this great movie? Die in a fire, please!

    2 years ago

    this is the 1997 version not the 1982 version....fyi

    2 years ago

    V: 10 A:8 .

    I'm from 1983 and i've never seen this movie. Never seemed interesting enough for me to see it. So after this DL this is a big YAAWWNN type of movie. Just wanted to catch up on the story before the new one. And i already read this one was better than the new one. Jeeezzzz.

    6 years ago

    Thanks for this great upload. Quality is great as always from YIFY...........And for all those complaining about size and quality issues, just get your hollow skulls and get is crushed or make your own copy and watch.......

    5 years ago

    It isn't a "remake" it's the "Final" version produced under the watch of Ridley Scott. It's closer (according to him) to his original vision. There is no remake.

    3 years ago

    it takes a real bunch of assholes to complain about a free movie, whose size is obvious before you even begin to download. you got something better to upload, then do it. otherwise STFU you whiny pansies.

    2 years ago

    V: 10 A:8 .

    I'm from 1983 and i've never seen this movie. Never seemed interesting enough for me to see it. So after this DL this is a big YAAWWNN type of movie. Just wanted to catch up on the story before the new one. And i already read this one was better than the new one. Jeeezzzz.

    Files

    Blade.Runner.Final.Cut.1997.720p.BluRay.x264.YIFY.mp4 736 MB
    Blade.Runner.Final.Cut.1997.720p.BluRay.x264.YIFY.srt 52 kB
    Other/AhaShare.com.txt 59 B
    Other/Torrent downloaded from Demonoid.com - Copy.txt 47 B
    Other/Torrent Downloaded From ExtraTorrent.com.txt 353 B
    WWW.YIFY-TORRENTS.COM.jpg 131 kB
    Blade Runner (1982) [The FInal Cut] 720p BrRip - 700MB - YIFY 737 MB
    /AhaShare.com.txt 59 B
    /Torrent downloaded from Demonoid.com Copy.txt 47 B
    /Torrent Downloaded From ExtraTorrent.com.txt 353 B
    /WWW.YIFYTORRENTS.COM.jpg 128 kB

    Stream

    Downloading Seeding Blade.Runner (1997) from to 0 peers.
    of
    0 b/s / ↗0 b/s